By Topic

Pseudocodeword Performance Analysis for LDPC Convolutional Codes

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Smarandache, R. ; Dept. of Math. & Stat., San Diego State Univ., San Diego, CA ; Pusane, A.E. ; Vontobel, P.O. ; Costello, D.J., Jr.

Message-passing iterative decoders for low-density parity-check (LDPC) block codes are known to be subject to decoding failures due to so-called pseudocodewords. These failures can cause the large signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) performance of message-passing iterative decoding to be worse than that predicted by the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding union bound. In this paper, we address the pseudocodeword problem from the convolutional code perspective. In particular, we compare the performance of LDPC convolutional codes with that of their "wrapped" quasi-cyclic block versions and we show that the minimum pseudoweight of an LDPC convolutional code is at least as large as the minimum pseudoweight of an underlying quasi-cyclic code. This result, which parallels a well-known relationship between the minimum Hamming weight of convolutional codes and the minimum Hamming weight of their quasi-cyclic counterparts, is due to the fact that every pseudocodeword in the convolutional code induces a pseudocodeword in the block code with pseudoweight no larger than that of the convolutional code's pseudocodeword. This difference in the weight spectra leads to improved performance at low-to-moderate SNRs for the convolutional code, a conclusion supported by simulation results.

Published in:

Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:55 ,  Issue: 6 )