By Topic

Solid-liquid nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation and signal amplitude relationships with ranking of seasoned softwoods and hardwoods

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)
Fantazzini, P. ; Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy ; Maccotta, A. ; Gombia, M. ; Garavaglia, C.
more authors

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1063/1.2354322 

In 1H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) relaxation measurements for a set of eight hardwood and softwood samples, each free induction decay (FID) is fitted by the sum of a “solid” signal of the form A exp[-c(t/TS)2][1-g(t/TS)2+h(t/TS)4] plus a “liquid” signal B exp(-t/T2-FID). Distributions of longitudinal (T1) relaxation times were computed separately for the solid and liquid components, giving also the solid/liquid 1H ratio α. From measurements on the samples dried, seasoned, and hydrated, the moisture content (liquid/solid weight ratio) was found to be approximately 0.50/α. For each of the “seasoned” samples (10%–13% moisture content) a single T1 peak was found for the solid and two for the liquid, with the longer liquid T1 close to that of the solid, but with some differences exceeding perceived experimental uncertainties. None of the solid or liquid-long T1’s is much less than 20 ms, even though liquid-short times go as low as 0.35 ms, appearing to negate simple solid-to-liquid exchange on a millisecond time scale. Data for six of the samples (all except for two resin-containing pine species) can be formally fitted by a two-site exchange model, in which cases the solid-to-liquid exchange times are a few tens of milliseconds. For our set of wood samples, each of the above three T1 values, and also the overall liquid geometric-mean and rate-average T<- inf>1’s, as well as the liquid long-T1 fraction, for a seasoned hardwood is longer than the corresponding value for any softwood, suggesting that relaxation parameters may provide a useful ranking of seasoned woods.

Published in:

Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:100 ,  Issue: 7 )