By Topic

Reactive ion etching of plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition amorphous silicon and silicon nitride: Feeding gas effects

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Kuo, Yue ; IBM Research Division, T. J. Watson Research Center, P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1116/1.576833 

Reactive ion etching of PECVD a‐Si:H and silicon nitride films was investigated using CF4, C2F6, CHF3, CF3Cl, and CF2Cl2 gases. Under the same power the a‐Si:H etch rate decreases in the order of: CF4∼CF3Cl≫CF2Cl2≫C2F6≫CHF3; and the nitride etch rate decreases in the order of: CF4≫CF3Cl∼C2F6≫CF2Cl2≫CHF3. The etch selectivity is controlled by two competitive mechanisms: plasma chemistry and surface reactions. When no surface mass‐transfer‐limit layer is formed, the plasma phase chemistry dominates the etch rate of the film. For example, the silicon etch rate increases with the chlorine concentration in the plasma phase. When the surface is covered with a thin film, the etch rate is controlled by the ion bombardment energy. For example, the film etch rate in the C2F6 plasma depends on the self‐bias voltage only. ESCA and emission spectra results support the above theory.

Published in:

Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films  (Volume:8 ,  Issue: 3 )