Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Modulation doping in Ge(x)Si(1-x)/Si strained layer heterostructures: Effects of alloy layer thickness, doping setback, and cladding layer dopant concentration

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
People, R. ; AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 ; Bean, J.C. ; Lang, D.V.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1116/1.573328 

Selectively doped GexSi1-x/Si strained layer heterostructures have been grown in a single quantum well configuration on 〈001〉‐Si substrate using molecular beam epitaxy. The modulation doping effect has been observed in p‐type structures only; although both n‐ and p‐type double heterostructures were grown. We have investigated the effects of: (i) alloy layer thickness (well width), (ii) doping setback, and (iii) cladding layer dopant concentration, on the hole mobilities. At present, optimum structures show peak hole mobilities in excess of 3300 cm2V-1s-1 at 4.2 K, sheet charge densities of 3.0–14×1011 cm-2, and hole effective mass m h =0.32±0.03 m0. It is found that the low temperature (T∼10 K) hole mobility, in structure having x=0.2 is relatively insensitive to alloy layer (well) thickness in the range 100 Å≲Lw≲Lc; where Lc is the critical thickness marking the transition from strained layer to relaxed, misfit accommodated, alloy growth. For Lw≫Lc, misfit dislocation scattering dramatically decreases μh at T≲100 K; whereas for Lw≲100 Å the hole mobility is uniformly lowered over the entire range of measurement temperatures. Doping setback and cladding layer dopant concentration affect the mobility via changes in sheet charge density, in a manner consistent with theoretical expectations. The absence of the modulation doping effect in n‐type heterostructure is taken as an indication that ΔEv≫ΔEc.

Published in:

Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films  (Volume:3 ,  Issue: 3 )

Date of Publication:

May 1985

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.