Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Contact etch scaling with contact dimension

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
McNevin, S.C. ; Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 ; Cerullo, M.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link: 

It is known that the contact etch rate decreases with decreasing diameter. Etch depth measurements for deep submicron contacts will be shown to depend linearly on (1/contact diameter). This experimental dependence will then be compared to that predicted for various theoretical etching models. One way in which these models differ is the assumed rate limiting species: ions or neutrals. Another difference is the interaction of neutrals with the sidewalls of the contact. The nature of this interaction differs for the various models. The models also differ in the effect of the contact sidewalls on the ion trajectory. All of the models predict a decreasing etch depth as a function of contact diameter. However, some of the models more accurately predict the observed (1/contact diameter) dependence of the measured etch depth. It will be suggested that elements of the various theoretical models be combined. In particular, contact etching probably depends on both the ions and neutrals. Accurate models would therefore take into account the different aspect ratio dependences of these charged and uncharged species. It is also urged that modeling should address not only the etch depth at a given etch time, but also as a function of the etch time. The models and experiments should also look at a range of contact diameters (0.1–1.0 μm). Both models and experiments should also determine the side wall angle and the curvature of the etching front in the oxide. © 1998 American Vacuum Society.

Published in:

Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films  (Volume:16 ,  Issue: 3 )

Date of Publication:

May 1998

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.