By Topic

Analysis of Two Alternative ADI-FDTD Formulations for Transverse-Electric Waves in Lossy Materials

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Pereda, J.A. ; Dept. de Ing. de Comun. (DICOM), Univ. de Cantabria, Santander, Spain ; Grande, A. ; Gonzalez, O. ; Vegas, A.

A numerical dispersion analysis of the alternating-direction implicit finite-difference time-domain method for transverse-electric waves in lossy materials is presented. Two different finite-difference approximations for the conduction terms are considered: the double-average and the synchronized schemes. The numerical dispersion relation is derived in a closed form and validated through numerical simulations. This study shows that, despite its popularity, the accuracy of the double-average scheme is sensitive to how well the relaxation-time constant of the material is resolved by the time step. Poor resolutions lead to unacceptably large numerical errors. On the other hand, for good conductors, the synchronized scheme allows stability factors as large as 100 to be used without deteriorating the accuracy significantly.

Published in:

Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:57 ,  Issue: 7 )