By Topic

High-Efficiency Soft-Error-Tolerant Digital Signal Processing Using Fine-Grain Subword-Detection Processing

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Yuan-Hao Huang ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Nat. Tsing-Hua Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan

The soft error problem in digital circuits is becoming increasingly important as the IC fabrication technology progresses from the deep submicrometer scale to the nanometer scale. This paper proposes a subword-detection processing (SDP) technique and a fine-grain soft-error-tolerance (FGSET) architecture to improve the performance of the digital signal processing circuit. In the SDP technique, the logic masking property of the soft error in the combinational circuit is utilized to mask the single-event upset (SEU) caused by disturbing particles in the inactive area. To further improve the performance, the masked portion of the datapath can be used as the estimation redundancy in the algorithmic softerror-tolerance (ASET) technique. This technique is called subword-detection and redundant processing (SDRP). In the FGSET architecture, the soft error in each processing element (fine grain) can be recovered by the arithmetic datapath-level ASET technique. Analysis of the fast Fourier transform processor example shows that the proposed FGSET architecture can improve the performance of the coarse-grain SET (CGSET) by 8.5 dB. The low-cost SDP technique (1.03x) yields a noise reduction of 5.3 dB over the CGSET approach (1.40x), while the efficient SDRP I (1.57x) and SDRP II (1.88x) techniques outperform the CGSET approach by 24.5 and 30.5 dB, respectively.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems  (Volume:18 ,  Issue: 2 )