Referenced Items are not available for this document.
A comparison was made between the measured performance of a 3-phase, 400 Hz, 200 V induction motor, using its standard, cast aluminium, cage rotor and a saturistor rotor with idle bars of Alcomax III in the outer portions of the slots. At stall, on full voltage, the saturistor motor had 10% lower line current and 25% lower torque. On load, at rated speed, the saturistor motor operated with about 10% lower current and power than the standard motor, and its efficiency was about 10% greater. The saturistor motor had the operational disadvantages of lower peak torque, and about 5% lower power factor.
Published in:
Electric Power Applications, IEE Journal on
(Volume:2
,
Issue:
4
)
Date of Publication: August 1979
- Page(s):
- 145 - 148
- ISSN :
- 0140-1327
- Digital Object Identifier :
- 10.1049/ij-epa:19790024
- Product Type:
- Journals & Magazines
- Date of Current Version :
- 26 August 2009
- Issue Date :
- August 1979
About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies
A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.
