By Topic

UHF MILSATCOM Demand Assignment One Layer versus Two Layer

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
French, C.E. ; M/A-COM Government Systems ; Seelig, F.W.

This Paper addresses two alternative approaches for demand assignment for UHF military satellite communications (MILSATCOM). The first approach uses two layers of protocol. The top layer is a menu-driven time-division multiple access (TDMA)/demand-assigned multiple access (DAMA) system with an automated controller. The second layer consists of two fixed slot assignments for networks with their own demand assignment protocols--the second layer. The alternative approach is to use the top-layer menu-driven TDMA/DAMA protocol with an automated controller as the single layer of demand assignment. That is, the users previously in the second layer compete with all the other users on the same basis. The objective of this paper is to compare the two alternatives for typical traffic expected for Navy users and to characterize the reasons for efficiency limitations and blockage modes.

Published in:

Military Communications Conference - Crisis Communications: The Promise and Reality, 1987. MILCOM 1987. IEEE  (Volume:2 )

Date of Conference:

19-22 Oct. 1987