Close category search window
 

Optimal design and comparison of different PM synchronous generator systems for wind turbines

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Yu-Shi Xue ; State Key Lab. of Power Transm. Equip. & Syst. Security & New Technol., Chongqing Univ., Chongqing ; Li Han ; Hui Li ; Li-Dan Xie

The objective of this paper is to compare the permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) systems for wind turbines with the different drive trains and power ratings by design optimization. The comparison is mainly based on the cost and annual energy production (AEP) for a given wind climate. Firstly, the analytical models of the wind turbine, the 1-stage and 3-stage gearbox, the 3-phase radial-flux PMSG and the back-to-back converter are presented respectively. Then the direct-drive PMSG (DDPMSG), the PMSG with 1-stage gearbox (PMSG1G) and the PMSG with 3-stage gearbox (PMSG3G) are optimized by the genetic algorithm for the minimal system cost respectively. The optimized results of DDPMSG are validated by the finite element method. Furthermore, a range of wind turbines from 750 kW to 10 MW are compared to get the tendency. The suitable range of gear ratios of PMSG1G in the different power ratings is also investigated. At last, the efficiency and loss characteristics of the different wind generator systems are discussed. The results show that DDPMSG has the highest AEP, but it is more expensive than PMSG1G and PMSG3G with the increase of power rating. PMSG1G seems more attractive in terms of AEP per cost. PMSG3G has no significant advantage compared with others.

Published in:
Electrical Machines and Systems, 2008. ICEMS 2008. International Conference on

Date of Conference: 17-20 Oct. 2008

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.