By Topic

Optimizing Galois Field Arithmetic for Diverse Processor Architectures and Applications

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Kevin M. Greenan ; Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, kmgreen@cs.ucsc.edu ; Ethan L. Miller ; S. J. Thomas J. E. Schwarz

Galois field implementations are central to the design of many reliable and secure systems, with many systems implementing them in software. The two most common Galois field operations are addition and multiplication; typically, multiplication is far more expensive than addition. In software, multiplication is generally done with a look-up to a pre-computed table, limiting the size of the field and resulting in uneven performance across architectures and applications. In this paper, we first anaylze existing table-based implementation and optimization techniques for multiplication in fields of the form GF(21). Next, we propose the use of techniques in composite fields: extensions of GF(21) in which multiplications are performed in GF(21) and efficiently combined. The composite field technique trades computation for storage space, which prevents eviction of look-up tables from the CPU cache and allows for arbitrarily large fields. Most Galois field optimizations are specific to a particular implementation; our technique is general and may be applied in any scenario requiring Galois fields. A detailed performance study across five architectures shows that the relative performance of each approach varies with architecture, and that CPU, memory limitations and fields size must be considered when selecting an appropriate Galois field implementation. We also find that the use of our composite field implementation is often faster and less memory intensive than traditional algorithms for GF(21).

Published in:

2008 IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computers and Telecommunication Systems

Date of Conference:

8-10 Sept. 2008