By Topic

On the Performance of Autocorrelation Estimation Algorithms for fMRI Analysis

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Lenoski, B. ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ ; Baxter, L.C. ; Karam, L.J. ; Maisog, J.
more authors

Pre-whitening of fMRI time-series is commonly performed to address temporal autocorrelations. The pre-whitening procedure requires knowledge of the spatially dependent autocorrelations, which in turn must be estimated from the observed data. The accuracy of the autocorrelation estimation algorithm is important because biased autocorrelation estimates result in biased test statistics, thereby increasing the expected false-positive and/or false-negative rates. Thus, a methodology for testing the accuracy of autocorrelation estimates and for assessing the performance of today's state-of-the-art autocorrelation estimation algorithms is needed. To address these problems, we propose an evaluation framework that tests for significant autocorrelation bias in the model residuals of a general linear model analysis. We apply the proposed testing framework to 18 pre-surgical fMRI mapping datasets from ten patients and compare the performance of popular fMRI autocorrelation estimation algorithms. We also identify five consistent spectral patterns representative of the encountered autocorrelation structures and show that they are well described by a second-order/two-pole model. We subsequently show that a nonregularized, second-order autoregressive model, AR(2), is sufficient for capturing the range of temporal autocorrelations found in the considered fMRI datasets. Finally, we explore the bias versus predictability tradeoff associated with regularization of the autocorrelation coefficients. We find that the increased bias from regularization outweighs any gains in predictability. Based on the obtained results, we expect that a second-order, nonregularized AR algorithm will provide the best performance in terms of producing white residuals and achieving the best possible tradeoff between maximizing predictability and minimizing bias for most fMRI datasets.

Published in:

Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of  (Volume:2 ,  Issue: 6 )