Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

3-D Eddy-Current Imaging of Metal Tubes by Gradient-Based, Controlled Evolution of Level Sets

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Abascal, J.F.P.J. ; Dept. de Rech. en Electromagn., CNRS-Supelec-Univ Paris Sud 11, Gif-sur-Yvette ; Lambert, M. ; Lesselier, D. ; Dorn, O.

Eddy-current nondestructive testing is widely used to detect defects within a metal structure. It is also useful to characterize their location and shape provided that proper maps of variations of impedance that the defects induce are available. Imaging of void defects in the wall of a hollow, nonmagnetic metal tube, is performed herein by controlled evolution of level sets. Such data are variations of impedance data collected by a circular probe array close to the inner surface of the tube when a coil source operated at one single frequency is set along its axis at some distance from the array, both receiver and coil source being moved simultaneously. The defect zone is represented in implicit fashion as a zero level set, which is amenable to topological changes via a nonlinear iterative method that minimizes a least-square cost functional made of the difference between the measured (computer simulated) and model data. The procedure requires the rigorous calculation of the gradient of the variations of impedance, in the case of a multistatic configuration (different driver and receiver coils), a vector domain integral field formulation being used for that purpose. Numerical examples developed by a dedicated extension of the general-purpose CIVA platform show pros and cons of the approach for inner, outer, and through-wall void defects. Further comparisons present results provided by an independently developed binary-specialized method.

Published in:

Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:44 ,  Issue: 12 )

Date of Publication:

Dec. 2008

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.