Scheduled System Maintenance on May 29th, 2015:
IEEE Xplore will be upgraded between 11:00 AM and 10:00 PM EDT. During this time there may be intermittent impact on performance. We apologize for any inconvenience.
By Topic

A comparison of Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy inference systems for evaluating the quality of experience of Hapto-Audio-Visual applications

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Hamam, A. ; Sch. of Inf. Technol. & Eng., Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON ; Georganas, Nicolas D.

Virtual reality applications which incorporate haptic devices to enrich userspsila sense of touch are increasing in number. Assessing the quality of experience (QoE) of these applications reflects the amount of overall satisfaction and benefit gained from the application plus it lays the foundation for ideal user-centric design in the future. In this paper we build on our QoE fuzzy logic model, previously simulated and tested, by comparing results from two different and well-established fuzzy systems: Mamdani and Sugeno. The results analytically demonstrate the essential differences between the two systems and the benefits of using either one in assessing the overall QoE.

Published in:

Haptic Audio visual Environments and Games, 2008. HAVE 2008. IEEE International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

18-19 Oct. 2008