Close category search window
 

Experimental comparisons among various models for the reverse annealing of the effective concentration of ionized space charges (Neff) of neutron irradiated silicon detectors

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Li, Z. ; Brookhaven Nat. Lab., Upton, NY, USA

Experimental data of the reverse annealing of the effective concentration of ionized space charges (Neff, also called effective doping or impurity concentration) of neutron irradiated high resistivity silicon detectors has been compared with various models. The models include the compensation model (first order), the cluster model of the first order, the neutral to acceptor model (first order), and the cluster model of the second order. Detectors irradiated to various neutron fluences have been annealed at 80°C for up to 17 hours to reach the saturation of the first apparent stage of the Neff reverse anneal, which is equivalent of about one year of room temperature (RT) anneal. The annealing time constant, defined as the time at half saturation τ1/2, has been found to be virtually a constant (~140 minutes±l4%) for detectors irradiated to fluences ranging from 8.2×1012 n/cm2 to 3.2×1013 n/cm2, which is the distinguishing characteristic of the first order process. The least square fit of the data to the first order models has shown a time constant of 221.7 minutes with a 14% error and that to the second order model has shown a k constant of 7.3×10-5 s-1 with a 37% error. The best fit, however, is a first order fit with two time constants: a short one (~44 minutes±25%) with a small amplitude and a longer one (~290 minutes±l2%) with an almost five times larger amplitude, suggesting that even for the apparent first stage of the N eff reverse anneal, there may be two stages. There is also evidence that even after the apparent first stage anneal, there is at least another stage which shows up in higher temperature annealing (150°C)

Published in:
Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:42 ,  Issue: 4 )

Date of Publication: Aug 1995

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.