By Topic

Comments on the letter 'Practical problems in the use of correlation analysis to indentify nonlinear systems'

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $33
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
S. A. Billings ; University of Sheffield, Department of Control Engineering, Sheffield, UK

I welcome the invitation of the Editors of IEE Proceedings Part D to reply to the letter by Boland and Doyle. The letter illustrates that a decomposition procedure given by Billings and Fakhouri [2] as part of an identification algorithm for the system illustrated in Fig. 1 cannot be used to provide individual discrete-time estimates of the linear subsystems of a continuous process. While this is a useful observation which arises whenever there is no sampler separating the two linear blocks, it does not invalidate the algorithm in any way and can easily be avoided. However, the statement by Boland and Doyle that the algorithm is only valid if 'the identification is performed in the same time domain as that on which the system operates' is incorrect, as shown below.

Published in:

IEE Proceedings D - Control Theory and Applications  (Volume:129 ,  Issue: 3 )