By Topic

MCG inverse solution: influence of coil size, grid size, number of coils, and SNR

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
K. Abraham-Fuchs ; Siemens Med. Eng. Group, Erlangen, West Germany ; S. Schneider ; H. Reichenberger

Model studies were used to assess quantitatively the influence of gradiometer coil size, number of measurement points, size of measurement grid and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the accuracy of the inverse solution from a magnetocardiogram. The human torso was modeled by an infinite half-space and the inverse solution was calculated by a moving dipole procedure. The most crucial parameter for inverse solution accuracy is the SNR. Up to a coil radius of 4 cm, the increasing SNR balances the loss due to field averaging, and the inverse solution is improved accordingly. A reasonable number of measurement points is about 15; using more points does not improve the inverse solution appreciably. in multichannel systems, grid size is limited by the size of the dewar. It is found that grid size is not crucial in the inverse solution; optimum size is an area of approximately 200-300 cm 2.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering  (Volume:35 ,  Issue: 8 )