By Topic

Medical image texture analysis: A case study with small bowel, retinal and mammogram images

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Khademi, A. ; Dept of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Toronto Univ., Toronto, ON ; Krishnan, S.

This work concerns the development of a generalized framework for computer-aided diagnosis of medical images. The system is built to mimic human texture perception as texture has been shown to be an important feature for pathology discrimination in medical images. In particular, it was shown by Julesz that orientation, frequency and scale are important markers for texture discrimination. Consequently, this work focuses on the design of a feature extraction scheme which identifies these texture markers (in accordance to Juleszpsilas human texture perception model). To get a rich description of the space-localized texture elements, wavelet analysis is employed using a scale-invariant representation. A robust, multiscale texture analysis scheme is employed to quantify the texture characteristics of the image. Wavelet-domain graylevel cooccurrence matrices were implemented in a variety of directions in order to capture the orientation of such texture elements (which also offered semi-rotational invariance). To test the systempsilas performance, retinal, small bowel and mammogram images were used. 75 small bowel images were correctly classified at an average classification accuracy of 85%, 86 retinal images had an average classification accuracy of 82.2% and the mammogram lesions (54) were classified correctly 69% on average.

Published in:

Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2008. CCECE 2008. Canadian Conference on

Date of Conference:

4-7 May 2008