By Topic

Underactuated Robot Control: Comparing LQR, Subspace Stabilization, and Combined Error Metric Approaches

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Marton, L. ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Sapientia Hungarian Univ. of Transylvania, Targu-Mures ; Hodel, A.S. ; Lantos, B. ; Hung, J.Y.

In this paper, three techniques for robust control of underactuated robots are experimentally compared on the classical ball and beam system. An adaptive tracking controller is first designed and implemented to identify the nominal friction characteristic. Then, designs for a linear quadratic regulator (LQR), subspace stabilization controller, and combined error metric controller are presented. Step response tests confirm that both nonlinear approaches exhibit better stability properties than the standard LQR design. In addition, the subspace stabilization approach permits a much more aggressive beam motion, resulting in shorter settling time with excellent control of overshoot.

Published in:

Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:55 ,  Issue: 10 )