Scheduled System Maintenance:
On May 6th, single article purchases and IEEE account management will be unavailable from 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM ET (12:00 - 16:00 UTC). We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Influence of Nonthermal Plasma Reactor Type on  \hbox {CF}_{4} and \hbox {SF}_{6} Abatements

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)

Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) and packed-bed reactor (PBR) are two of the commonly used nonthermal-plasma (NTP) reactors. In this paper, these two reactors are applied to remove two perfluorocompounds (PFCs), i.e., CF4 and SF6, which are extensively used in semiconductor- and liquid-crystal-display-manufacturing industries. Experimental results indicated that PBR constructed by packing dielectric pellets (chemical compositions: CuO 64%, ZnO 24%, Al2O3 10%, and MgO 2% by weight) inside the DBD reactor achieved a higher CF4 removal efficiency and a lower SF6 removal efficiency than that of the DBD reactor. In other words, different behavior between CF4 and SF6 removal efficiencies achieved with two different types of NTP reactors was found in this paper. To elucidate this interesting finding, the influences of the discharge power, the reactor temperature, the catalytic effect, the nature of pollutants, and the plasma characteristics of DBD and PBR were investigated. It is found that the last two factors are mainly responsible for the interesting finding. At the same discharge gap, it is well known that PBR possesses higher mean electron energy than nonpacked plasma reactor (like DBD). Nevertheless, the dissociative attachment reaction of SF6 : SF6 + e rarr SF5 - + F plays an important role for SF6 removal at low-electron-energy region. Therefore, a nonpacked plasma reactor is more suitable for SF6 removal; on the contrary, a PBR with higher mean electron energy is favorable for CF4 abatement. The finding provides useful information on selecting an appropriate NTP reactor for removing a specific PFC.

Published in:

Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:36 ,  Issue: 2 )