By Topic

Improving the Performance of Sampling-Based Motion Planning With Symmetry-Based Gap Reduction

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Peng Cheng ; Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia ; Frazzoli, E. ; LaValle, S.

Sampling-based nonholonomic and kinodynamic planning iteratively constructs solutions with sampled controls. A constructed trajectory is returned as an acceptable solution if its ldquogaps,rdquo including discontinuities within the trajectory and mismatches between the terminal and goal states, are within a given gap tolerance. For a given coarseness in the sampling of the control space, finding a trajectory with a small gap tolerance might be either impossible or extremely expensive. In this paper, we propose an efficient trajectory perturbation method, which complements existing steering and perturbation methods, enabling these sampling-based algorithms to quickly obtain solutions by reducing large gaps in constructed trajectories. Our method uses system symmetry, e.g., invariance of dynamics with respect to certain state transformations, to achieve efficient gap reduction by evaluating trajectory final state with a constant-time operation, and, naturally, generating the admissible perturbed trajectories. Simulation results demonstrate dramatic performance improvement for unidirectional, bidirectional, and PRM-based sampling-based algorithms with the proposed enhancement with respect to their basic counterparts on different systems: one with the second-order dynamics, one with nonholonomic constraints, and one with two different modes.

Published in:

Robotics, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:24 ,  Issue: 2 )