By Topic

A comparative study on Peer-to-Peer failure rate estimation

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Lei Ni ; Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Software Eng., Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC ; Harwood, A.

The robustness of Peer-to-Peer systems is challenged by its highly dynamic nature. Frequent peer failure and departure events introduce uncertainty for which is considered exceptional in traditional distributed systems. The difficulty of monitoring such large scale networks is further exacerbated because it has to be done in a completely decentralized way for both scalability and reliability concerns. Some methods for estimating peer failure rate have been applied in Peer-to-Peer systems, however their comparative performance has not yet been reported in the literature. We simulate three different failure rate estimation methods and compare their accuracy and response time with respect to sample size, stabilization interval and neighbour set size. We conclude that the Maximum Likelihood Method introduced is better than the Failure Frequency based Methods commonly used in current Peer-to-Peer systems.

Published in:

Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2007 International Conference on  (Volume:2 )

Date of Conference:

5-7 Dec. 2007