Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Comparative evaluation of two analytical methods for Helical Cone-Beam Tomography

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)

We present some extensions to the recently published "DBP-0" method which are important for making the algorithm more suitable for clinical routine. These extensions are (i) an incorporation of the slice thickness into the reconstruction process, (ii) a way of reconstructing a region of interest smaller than the FOV, (iii) the possibility to reconstruct from flying focal spot data and (iv) a frequency apodization scheme for influencing the resolution vs. noise level during reconstruction. We furthermore present an evaluation of the DBP-0 method against the approximate Weighted FBP (WFBP) algorithm in terms of resolution, noise and subjective appearance of reconstructed images.

Published in:

Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2007. NSS '07. IEEE  (Volume:6 )

Date of Conference:

Oct. 26 2007-Nov. 3 2007

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.