Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Performance Comparisons Between Carbon Nanotubes, Optical, and Cu for Future High-Performance On-Chip Interconnect Applications

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)

Optical interconnects and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) present promising options for replacing the existing Cu-based global/semiglobal (optics and CNT) and local (CNT) wires. We quantify the performance of these novel interconnects and compare it with Cu/low-kappa wires for future high-performance integrated circuits. We find that for a local wire, a CNT bundle exhibits a smaller latency than Cu for a given geometry. In addition, by leveraging the superior electromigration properties of CNT and optimizing its geometry, the latency advantage can be further amplified. For semiglobal and global wires, we compare both optical and CNT options with Cu in terms of latency, energy efficiency/power dissipation, and bandwidth density. The above trends are studied with technology node. In addition, for a future technology node, we compare the relationship between bandwidth density, power density, and latency, thus alluding to the latency and power penalty to achieve a given bandwidth density. Optical wires have the lowest latency and the highest possible bandwidth density using wavelength division multiplexing, whereas a CNT bundle has a lower latency than Cu. The power density comparison is highly switching activity (SA) dependent, with high SA favoring optics. At low SA, optics is only power efficient compared to CNT for a bandwidth density beyond a critical value. Finally, we also quantify the impact of improvement in optical and CNT technology on the above comparisons. A small monolithically integrated detector and modulator capacitance for optical interconnects (~10 fF) yields a superior power density and latency even at relatively lower SA (~20%) but at high bandwidth density. At lower bandwidth density and SA lower than 20%, an improvement in mean free path and packing density of CNT can render it most energy efficient.

Published in:

Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:54 ,  Issue: 12 )

Date of Publication:

Dec. 2007

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.