By Topic

Estimating the Quality of Widely Used Software Products Using Software Reliability Growth Modeling: Case Study of an IBM Federated Database Project

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Li, P.L. ; Silicon Valley Labs, San Jose ; Nakagawa, R. ; Montroy, R.

Software producers can better manage the quality of their deployed software products using estimates of quality. Current best practices for making estimates are to use software reliability growth modeling (SRGM), which assumes that testing environments approximate deployment environments. This important assumption does not hold for widely used software products, which are operated in a wide variety of configurations under many different usage scenarios. However, the literature contains little empirical data on the impact of this violation of assumptions on the accuracy and the usefulness of predictions. In this paper, we report results and experiences using SRGM on an IBM federated database project. We examine defect data from 3 releases spanning approximately 9 years. We find SRGM to be of limited use to the project: absolute relative errors are at least 34%, and predictions are, at times, implausible. We discuss alternative approaches for estimating quality of widely used software products.

Published in:

Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2007. ESEM 2007. First International Symposium on

Date of Conference:

20-21 Sept. 2007