By Topic

Research Guidelines for Digital Computer-Controlled Systems for Checkout and Fault Isolation

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Beckman, C. ; Institute for Cooperative Research and the Moore School of Electrical Engineering University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia 4, Pa. ; Bedrosian, S.D. ; Berkowitz, R.S. ; Chen, T.C.

The past decade has seen a tremendous increase in the complexity and capability of aerospace and weapons systems. However maintenance philosophy and checkout procedures have not kept pace. The maintenance procedures have been evolving slowly through three major phases: a. Manual Maintenance Procedures b. Serially Programmed Automatic Test Equipment c. Computer-Controlled Automatic Test Equipment In the latter case a small but highly capable general-purpose digital computer is used as the controller for the Automatic Test Equipment. Once a general standardized programmed set of stimuli and measuring instruments is incorporated in a computer-controlled automatic test system, one need only modify the program in the Automatic Test Equipment system memory rather than develop a new set of test equipment for each new system under test. Much of the basic feasibility work has already been completed for such computer controlled Automatic Test Equipment. This is summarized along with discussion of remaining problem areas. Of especial importance is the dependence of program details on the level of tests to be performed; e.g. overall system checkout or isolation of fault to subsystem, assembly, chassis, module, or component. It is shown that while the program details differ, the same test philosophy can be applied.

Published in:

Aerospace, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:1 ,  Issue: 2 )