By Topic

Internet-Enabled Calibration: An Analysis of Different Topologies and a Comparison of Two Different Approaches

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Sand, A. ; Norwegian Metrol. Service, Kjeller ; Stevens, M. ; Parkin, G.

This paper discusses different network topologies used in Internet-enabled metrology and calibration and explores and compares two different remote calibration systems used by the National Metrology Institutes in England and Norway: the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) and the Justervesenet (JV). The two systems are iGen (NPL) and iMet (JV). The systems both deal with remote calibration of electrical equipment but have substantial architecture differences. In iGen, calibration procedures are downloaded from a server and then locally run at the instrument client, where the operator sits. The client is generic in such a way that it is not dependent on the structure of the measurement procedures. In iMet, two clients can communicate via a public server, and the calibration process may be remotely controlled and monitored. That is, the instruments and the operator may be separated by the Internet.

Published in:

Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:56 ,  Issue: 5 )