Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

A Carrier-Based Unipolar PWM Current Controller That Minimizes the PWM-Cycle Average Current-Error Using Internal Feedback of the PWM Signals

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Salmon, J. ; Alberta Univ., Edmonton ; Liping Wang ; Noor, N. ; Krieger, A.W.

A carrier-based unipolar pulsewidth modulation (PWM) current controller is described using a one-phase PWM rectifier bridge as a test circuit. The controller PWM signal generator uses a sawtooth carrier signal to obtain both synchronized PWM waveforms and a constant switching frequency. A current-error signal and an amplitude modulation depth signal are used to create the input reference signal to the PWM signal generator. The amplitude modulation depth signal is obtained from the PWM-cycle average of the PWM signal generator output signals. This internal feedback is illustrated using a second-order low pass Butterworth filter. With an appropriately designed low-pass filter, the current-error signal is forced to be centered on zero over a PWM cycle. The maximum peak-peak magnitude of the current-error signal is used as a design guideline for deciding an appropriate gain constant in the controller current feedback loop. The low pass filter design is examined to determine a suitable gain and 20-dB attenuation frequency to minimize the current-error signal. The steady-state and transient operation of the proposed current controller is compared with a proportional-integral controller and an average current-error controller. SPICE simulations and experimental results are used to demonstrate the characteristics of the controller.

Published in:

Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:22 ,  Issue: 5 )

Date of Publication:

Sept. 2007

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.