By Topic

I Am a Scientist, Not a Philosopher!

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Peisert, S. ; Univ. of California, San Diego ; Bishop, M.

We longer live in the era of Aristotelian philosophers or alchemists attempting to turn lead into gold. Yet, you might be forgiven for thinking we were, after observing many computer security researchers' claims - even in papers published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceeding. Computer security is both an art and a science, but researchers frequently fail to follow the scientific method to support the claims they make in scientific, peer-reviewed papers. Some computer security research is highly mathematical and can be proven formally without experimentation. This article presents a method for scientific experimentation when others aren't appropriate or can't be readily applied. Our goal is to further motivate researchers to apply science to experiments and, in concert with our earlier work, offer a new technique for doing so.

Published in:

Security & Privacy, IEEE  (Volume:5 ,  Issue: 4 )