Close category search window
 

Performance Evaluation of Energy-Saving Mechanism Based on Probabilistic Sleep Interval Decision Algorithm in IEEE 802.16e

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Jung-Ryun Lee ; Univ. of Incheon, Incheon ; Dong-Ho Cho

While the legacy power-saving mechanism in wireless networks usually uses a predetermined and fixed sleep interval to enhance the energy conservation of mobile stations, the IEEE 802.16e Mobile WiMAX system adopts a power-saving mechanism with a binary truncated exponent (BTE) algorithm for determining sleep intervals. Although the BTE algorithm allows more flexibility in determining sleep intervals, it still does not consider the delay of the response packet. Thus, in this paper, we suggest a new power-saving mechanism, which is the probabilistic sleep interval decision (PSID) algorithm, in the context of an IEEE 802.16e Mobile WiMAX system. While the length of sleep interval is restricted by the upper and lower bounds, irrespective of response packet's arrival time under the BTE algorithm, the PSID algorithm determines sleep interval placement by using the distribution function of the response packet's arrival time so that the response packet may arrive at the base station during each sleep interval with the same probability. To compare the two algorithms, the main properties of the BTE algorithm and the proposed PSID algorithm are discussed, and a theoretical framework for analyzing its performance is provided. Analytical and simulation results show that under the BTE algorithm, energy consumption and buffering delay converge to a saturation point, and a short buffering delay can be obtained at the expense of sacrificing energy consumption. Meanwhile, the PSID algorithm performs better with respect to energy consumption and buffering delay than the BTE algorithm.

Published in:
Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:56 ,  Issue: 4 )

Date of Publication: July 2007

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.