By Topic

Convolutive Blind Source Separation Algorithms Applied to the Electrocardiogram of Atrial Fibrillation: Study of Performance

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Vaya, C. ; Castilla-la Mancha Univ., Cuenca ; Rieta, J.J. ; Sanchez, C. ; Moratal, D.

The analysis of the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most extended noninvasive technique in medical diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). In order to use the ECG as a tool for the analysis of AF, we need to separate the atrial activity (AA) from other cardioelectric signals. In this matter, statistical signal processing techniques, like blind source separation (BSS), are able to perform a multilead statistical analysis with the aim to obtain the AA. Linear BSS techniques can be divided in two groups depending on the mixing model: algorithms where instantaneous mixing of sources is assumed, and convolutive BSS (CBSS) algorithms. In this work, a comparison of performance between one relevant CBSS algorithm, namely Infomax, and one of the most effective independent component analysis (ICA) algorithms, namely FastICA, is developed. To carry out the study, pseudoreal AF ECGs have been synthesized by adding fibrillation activity to normal sinus rhythm. The algorithm performances are expressed by two indexes: the signal to interference ratio (SIRAA) and the cross-correlation (RAA) between the original and the estimated AA. Results empirically prove that the instantaneous mixing model is the one that obtains the best results in the AA extraction, given that the mean SIRAA obtained by the FastICA algorithm (37.6 plusmn 17.0 dB) is higher than the main SIRAA obtained by Infomax (28.5 plusmn 14.2 dB). Also the RAA obtained by FastICA (0.92 plusmn 0.13) is higher than the one obtained by Infomax (0.78 plusmn 0.16).

Published in:

Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:54 ,  Issue: 8 )