Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Indirect Dominant Mode Rejection: A Solution to Low Sample Support Beamforming

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Santos, E.L. ; Purdue Univ., West Lafayette ; Zoltowski, M.D. ; Rangaswamy, M.

Under conditions of low sample support, a low-rank solution of the minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) equations can yield a higher output signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) than the full-rank MVDR beamformer. In this paper, we investigate several low-rank beam- forming techniques, and we also propose a new beamformer that we refer to as the indirect dominant mode rejection (IDMR). We analyze the degradation in the output SINR caused by residual cross correlations embedded in the sampled covariance matrix due to low sample support. The IDMR beamformer is based on a parametric estimate of the covariance matrix, in which any cross correlation is canceled out. Simulations reveal that the IDMR beamformer yields a dramatic improvement in output SINR relative to the conjugate gradient (CG), principal component inverse (PCI), and dominant mode rejection (DMR) beamformers. In our investigation of the low-rank CG beamformer, we address the issue of whether the unity gain constraint in the look direction should be enforced a priori via the use of a blocking matrix or effected a posteriori through simple scaling of the beamforming vector. Remarkably, it is proven that the two methods yield exactly the same low-rank beamformer at each and every rank.

Published in:

Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:55 ,  Issue: 7 )

Date of Publication:

July 2007

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.