By Topic

Identifying Mechanisms That Highly Accelerated Tests Miss

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Luvalle, M.J. ; OFS Labs., Somerset, NJ

Extrapolating reliability from accelerated tests for technologies without field data always carries the risk that the accelerated tests do not show the mechanisms which dominate at operating conditions. In statistical terminology, such accelerated testing carries a risk of confounding. For linear models, there is theory which allows one to determine which models are confounded with others. This paper develops analogous theory for a simple kind of confounding model, evanescent processes, when kinetics is used as the basis of modeling accelerated testing. A heuristic for identifying simple evanescent processes that can give rise to disruptive alternatives (alternative models that reverse the decision which would be made based on modeling to date) is outlined. Then, we develop activity mapping, a tool for quantitatively identifying the parameter values of that evanescent process which can result in disruptive alternatives. Finally, we see how activity mapping can be used to identify experiments which help reveal such disruptive evanescent processes

Published in:

Reliability, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:56 ,  Issue: 2 )