By Topic

Comparison of Image Segmentation and Registration Based Methods for Analysis of Misaligned Dynamic H152O Cardiac PET Images

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Juslin, A. ; Inst. of Signal Process., Tampere Univ. of Technol. ; Tohka, J. ; Lotjonen, J. ; Ruotsalainen, U.

In this study, we compared quantitatively image segmentation and registration based methods to find misalignment between two dynamic H2 15O cardiac PET images. Due to a low contrast between tissues in oxygen-15-labeled images, we first applied independent component analysis (ICA) to separate the different cardiac structures. The misalignment was then defined from the separated ICA component images using two different methods. We used deformable models based dual surface minimization (DM-DSM) and normalized mutual information based image registration algorithms in the comparison. The evaluation was done using realistic phantom data, generated using the MCAT phantom and the PET SORTEO Monte Carlo simulator. The simulated data consisted patient movement between the image sets and in addition, to produce more realistic data the movement within one time frame due the respiratory and cardiac movement. The quantitative results showed that the image registration based method was more accurate to find the misalignment between the image sets than the segmentation based method. One reason for this was that the segmentation algorithm was more dependent on the quality of the ICA separation result.

Published in:

Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2006. IEEE  (Volume:6 )

Date of Conference:

Oct. 29 2006-Nov. 1 2006