Close category search window
 

Thematic Mapper Image Quality: Registration, Noise, And Resolution

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

7 Author(s)
Wrigley, Robert C. ; Ames Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Moffett Field, CA 94035 ; Card, Don H. ; Hlavka, Christine A. ; Hall, Jeff R.
more authors

This paper provides an assessment of Thematic Mapper data quality in terms of band-to-band registration, periodic noise, and spatial resolution. Based on the Thematic Mapper images analyzed so far, the band-to-band registration accuracy is very good. For bands within the same focal plane, the mean misregistrations are well within the specification, 0.2 pixel, except for the thermal band. The thermal band was misregistered by three pixels in each direction in early data products. The error in the across-scan direction was close to zero in later data products. For bands between the cooled and uncooled focal planes, there was a consistent mean misregistration of 0.5 pixels along-scan and 0.2-0.3 pixels across-scan, larger than the specified 0.3 pixel error for bands between focal planes. An analysis of the standard deviation of the misregistration indicated all band combinations would meet the registration specifications if the mean misregistrations were removed by the data processing software. Analysis of the periodic noise in one image indicated a noise component in bands 1-4 with a spatial frequency of 0.31 cycles/pixel. Other lower amplitude periodic components were also present. The periodic noise components obscured detail in areas of low contrast. Modulation transfer function (MTF) analysis in a comparative mode showed no difference in MTF between the forward and backward scans. The difference in MTF between radiometrically corrected data and geometrically corrrected data appeared to be attributable largely to the cubic convolution resampling used to derive the geometrically corrected data.

Published in:
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:GE-22 ,  Issue: 3 )

Date of Publication: May 1984

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.