Scheduled System Maintenance on May 29th, 2015:
IEEE Xplore will be upgraded between 11:00 AM and 10:00 PM EDT. During this time there may be intermittent impact on performance. We apologize for any inconvenience.
By Topic

Comparison of WiMAX coverage at 450MHz and 3.5GHz

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Javornik, T. ; Dept. of Commun. Syst., Jozef Stefan Inst., Ljubljana ; Kandus, G. ; Hrovat, A. ; Ozimek, I.

In this paper we calculate, analyze and compare the area covered by radio signal based on WiMAX standard at two carrier frequencies, namely 450 MHz and 3.5 GHz in flat rural, hilly rural and urban environment. The channel model proposed by WiMAX forum has been applied as path loss model at 3.5 GHz for cell coverage prediction, while at 450 MHz the Longley-Rice model for rural areas and Okumura Hata channel models for urban area is used. The cell size prediction strongly suggests to limit the 3.5 GHz frequency band to urban areas, where the higher system capacity is required, while in rural areas the 450 MHz carrier frequency provide good compromise between coverage and system capacity

Published in:

Software in Telecommunications and Computer Networks, 2006. SoftCOM 2006. International Conference on

Date of Conference:

Sept. 29 2006-Oct. 1 2006