By Topic

Transfer Functions for Partially Coherent SAR Systems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Raney, R.K. ; Canada Centre for Remote Sensing

An impulse response function and a transfer function of use for partially coherent systems are presented. Partially coherent systems are those that transform a complex amplitude input to an output intensity and are encountered in many guises including optical systems, radiometers, scatterometers, astronomical radars, and synthetic aperture radar. (In the fully coherent or noncoherent limits, linear analysis and the associated system descriptions are well known in terms of amplitude or modulation transfer functions, respectively.) Properties are derived herein for partially coherent systems that describe performance dependence on system phase and amplitude match to input signal characteristics and to system and signal partial coherence. Such systems are shown to be energy conservative in the event of coherence variations. Output spectral properties that describe the dependence of multiplicative Rayleigh noise (speckle) on input signal coherence, system coherence, and phase match are presented. Unlike linear systems, partially coherent systems require both (1) the impulse response and (2) a quantitative measure of scene/system coherence to adequately describe their performance. The general formulation of this paper is applied to synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging systems to derive closed-form results of importance for that discipline. It is shown that the mean output from a SAR for a random distributed scene input is not dependent on system focus, system coherence, or scene coherence, whereas imagery of scene detail is dependent on these same parameters. The speckle spectrum is a function of system coherence, but not a function of scene coherence or system focus.

Published in:

Aerospace and Electronic Systems, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:AES-19 ,  Issue: 5 )