By Topic

The Effects of Soil Moisture, Surface Roughness, and Vegetation on L-Band Emission and Backscatter

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
James R. Wang ; NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 ; Edwin T. Engman ; Tsan Mo ; Thomas J. Schmugge
more authors

Measurements with Shuttle Imaging Radar B (SIR-B) at 1.28 GHz and an airborne multiple-beam push-broom radiometer at 1.4 GHz were made over a number of agricultural fields near Fresno, California during October 7-10, 1984. These measurements provided a unique data set for studies of microwave emission and backscatter from surfaces of various characteristics. The effects of surface roughness and vegetation (alfalfa and lettuce) were analyzed with respect to the responses of microwave emission and backscatter to soil-moisture variations. A theoretical model (Kirchhoff approximation) was employed to assess these effects. It was found that for microwave emission, the effect of surface roughness is less significant compared to that of vegetation. On the other hand, the surface roughness was shown to play a dominant role compared to the vegetation cover in the microwave backscatterve backscatter. The two roughness parameters in the theoretical model calculations were the surface correlation length and the standard deviation of surface height. These parameters were found to be affected strongly by the soil-texture effect in the emissivity calculations. A disagreement was found between the calculated and the observed scattering coefficients if the measured surface correlation length and standard deviation of surface height were input to the model. Either one of these two parameters had to be modified appreciably to bring a comparability between the measured and calculated scattering coefficients.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing  (Volume:GE-25 ,  Issue: 6 )