By Topic

Spreading-Hopping Tradeoff in Wideband Ad-hoc Communications

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Srinivasa, S. ; Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2625. Email: sudhirs@uci.edu ; Jafar, S.A.

We explore the tradeoff between hopping and spreading in a wideband spread spectrum transmitter-receiver link in an ad-hoc network with multi-user interference. The receiver is assumed to track the user's channel, spreading signature and the overall SINR. Using expressions for the ergodic capacity of the link, we determine the amount of spreading required that maximizes the link capacity. As a comparison we also discuss optimal spreads in centralized architectures where the receiver has interference knowledge. While we find that in general a combination of spreading and hopping may achieve higher throughputs than either pure spreading or pure hopping, we prove that pure hopping and pure spreading are optimal strategies for ad-hoc networks at low SINR and for centralized networks at all SINR, respectively. Numerical results suggest that in an ad-hoc network, spreading is beneficial at high SNR.

Published in:

Communications, 2006. ICC '06. IEEE International Conference on  (Volume:9 )

Date of Conference:

June 2006