System Maintenance:
There may be intermittent impact on performance while updates are in progress. We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Comparative analysis of the performance limits of Franz-Keldysh effect and quantum-confined Stark effect electroabsorption waveguide modulators

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Chin, M.K. ; Sch. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Nanyang Technol. Unit., Singapore

The author systematically analyses and compares the performance limits of quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) and Franz-Keldysh effect (FKE) electroabsorption waveguide modulators, in terms of insertion loss, contrast ratio, drive power and bandwidth (or bit-rate). The author first derives the universal material figures of merit for electroabsorption modulators which form the basis for comparison. In addition to the magnitude of electroabsorption Δα, the critical material parameters are Δα/α0 and Δα/F2 where α0 is the onstate residual absorption, and F is the applied electric field. The author proposes a waveguide design which will meet the insertion loss and contrast ratio requirements while minimising the available power/bandwidth (Pac/Δf) ratio. The author shows that, while satisfying the same insertion loss requirement, a QCSE modulator employing the optimum quantum well structure can have, in principle, an order of magnitude better performance in terms of Pac/Δf than one based on FKE. Correspondingly, the Δα/F2 is an order of magnitude larger in QCSE than in FKE, principally because of the much larger absorption change that is possible with QCSE

Published in:

Optoelectronics, IEE Proceedings -  (Volume:142 ,  Issue: 2 )