By Topic

A fundamental limit on the performance of correlation based phase correction and flow estimation techniques

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Walker, W.F. ; Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Duke Univ., Durham, NC, USA ; Trahey, G.E.

Cross correlation and similar operations are used in ultrasonic imaging to estimate blood or soft tissue motion in one or more dimensions and to measure echo arrival time differences for phase aberration correction. These estimates are subject to large errors known as false peaks and smaller magnitude errors known as jitter. While false peaks can sometimes be removed through nonlinear processing, jitter errors place a fundamental limit on the performance of delay estimation techniques. This paper applies the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound to derive analytical expressions which predict the magnitude of jitter for 1-D and 2-D problems using both radio frequency (RF) and envelope detected data. One-dimensional simulation results are presented which closely match theoretical predictions. These results indicate that for typical clinical conditions axial jitter for detected data is approximately five times greater than that for RF data. Lateral jitter is approximately ten times greater than axial jitter for RF data. Examples are presented which utilize these results to predict the performance of phase aberration correction and flow estimation systems.<>

Published in:

Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:41 ,  Issue: 5 )