By Topic

Comparison of Prony and eigenanalysis for power system control design

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Grund, C.E. ; GE Ind. & Power Syst., Schenectady, NY, USA ; Paserba, J.J. ; Hauer, J.F. ; Nilsson, S.L.

The authors describe comparative results of direct (eigenanalysis) and indirect (Prony analysis) methods for generating frequency-domain data for power system control design. The two methods are described briefly and important input data constants are discussed. The methods are applied to the same model, a medium-scale model of the Midcontinent Area Power Pool (MAPP). Modal parameters (frequencies and damping) and transfer function poles and zeros are compared as calculated by the two methods

Published in:

Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:8 ,  Issue: 3 )