By Topic

Use of smoothing in class 1 frequency domain estimation matrix filters

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Duysal, E. ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Miami Univ., Coral Gables, FL, USA ; Lindquist, Claude S.

It is observed that the performance of the frequency-domain Wiener estimation filters relies heavily on the type of smoothing algorithm and the characteristics of the signal. Thus, the designer or engineer must carefully select the optimum system regarding the implementation domain, smoothing algorithm, and computation complexity. Simulations showed that a frequency-domain Wiener estimation filter using diagonal smoothing perfectly estimates a narrowband signal. On the other hand, circulant smoothing is proved to be superior when estimating wideband signals. Both Toeplitz and circulant smoothing perform well for time-limited signals, thus necessitating a tradeoff between vector sparseness and MSE. It was found that diagonal smoothing yields the most computationally efficient structure. Therefore, advantage must be taken of this fact; for example, if the Fourier transformation is used, filters performing well under frequency-domain circulant smoothing can be replaced with time-domain filters using diagonal smoothing techniques

Published in:

Circuits and Systems, 1991., Proceedings of the 34th Midwest Symposium on

Date of Conference:

14-17 May 1991