By Topic

Implementing atomicity in two systems: techniques, tradeoffs, and experience

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Cabrera, L.-F. ; Dept. of Comput. Sci., IBM Almaden Res. Center, San Jose, CA, USA ; McPherson, J.A. ; Schwarz, P.M. ; Wyllie, J.C.

This paper presents our experience with implementing atomicity in two systems: the QuickSilver distributed file system and the Starburst relational database manager. Each of these systems guarantees that certain collections of operations done on behalf of their clients execute atomically, despite process, machine, or network failures. In this paper we describe the atomic properties implemented by each system, present the algorithms and mechanisms used, examine the similarities and differences between the two systems, and give the rationale for different design decisions. We demonstrate that the support of atomicity with high performance requires a variety of techniques carefully chosen to balance the amount of data logged, the level of concurrency allowed, and the mutual consistency requirements of sets of objects, The main goal is to help others implement efficient systems that support atomicity

Published in:

Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:19 ,  Issue: 10 )