By Topic

Modern apparent power definitions: theoretical versus practical Approach-the general case

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Pajic, S. ; Worcester Polytech. Inst., MA ; Emanuel, A.E.

The definition of apparent power for unbalanced or non-sinusoidal three-phase systems is still a controversial issue. Two schools of thought are prevalent at this moment. Both schools define the apparent power as the maximum active power that can be delivered to the load while adjusting or maintaining unchanged certain equivalent values of load voltages and currents unchanged. However, one definition uses a pure mathematical approach that leads to a condition where negative and zero-sequence currents may be present. The second definition is based on a practical engineering concept based on assumption that unity power factor implies a perfectly balanced system with pure positive-sequence voltages and currents, (neutral current nil). This paper starts with the theoretical analysis of the most general case when both the network and the load are unbalanced. Comparison among the results obtained by using the two methods indicate minor differences, nevertheless the unity power factor requirement for symmetrical and balanced condition seems to be the better approach for the apparent power definition

Published in:

Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:21 ,  Issue: 4 )