By Topic

Simulation of Intramuscular EMG Signals Detected Using Implantable Myoelectric Sensors (IMES)

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Lowery, M.M. ; Sch. of Electr., Electron. & Mech. Eng., Univ. Coll. Dublin ; Weir, R.Fff. ; Kuiken, T.A.

The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of recording independent electromyographic (EMG) signals from the forearm using implantable myoelectric sensors (IMES), for myoelectric prosthetic control. Action potentials were simulated using two different volume conductor models: a finite-element (FE) model that was used to explore the influence of the electrical properties of the surrounding inhomogeneous tissues and an analytical infinite volume conductor model that was used to estimate the approximate detection volume of the implanted sensors. Action potential amplitude increased progressively as conducting electrodes, the ceramic electrode casing and high resistivity encapsulation tissue were added to the model. For the muscle fiber locations examined, the mean increase in EMG root mean square amplitude when the full range of material properties was included in the model was 18.2% (plusmn8.15). Changing the orientation of the electrode with respect to the fiber direction altered the shape of the electrode detection volume and reduced the electrode selectivity. The estimated detection radius of the IMES electrode, assuming a cylindrical muscle cross section, was 4.8, 6.2, and 7.5 mm for electrode orientations of 0deg, 22.5deg, and 45deg with respect to the muscle fiber direction

Published in:

Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:53 ,  Issue: 10 )