By Topic

The electrode system in impedance-based ventilation measurement

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Shen Luo ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Wisconsin Univ., Madison, WI, USA ; Afonso, V.X. ; Webster, J.G. ; Tompkins, Willis J.

The authors determined which electrode types, sizes, and locations were best suited for impedance-based ventilation measurement. They compared 14 electrodes from two main groups: adhesive-gel and conductive rubber electrodes. Adhesive-gel electrodes were easy to apply, made good body contact, and did not slip during the course of the experiment. Higher signal-to-motion artifact ratios (SARs) were obtained when electrode area was increased by connecting several small electrodes together rather than by using a single electrode with a large area. The peak SAR was achieved when two electrode arrays (area=70 cm 2) were centered at the eighth intercostal spaces on opposite midaxillary lines. To determine the optimal electrode locations, the authors placed 32 electrodes on the trunk and recorded impedance between 171 electrode combinations on ten normal adult subjects. The data indicate that the SARs are highest when one electrode is place on the midpoint between the left and right second intercostal spaces on the sternum and the other electrode is placed in the opposite position on the back.

Published in:

Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:39 ,  Issue: 11 )