Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Eliciting engineering judgments in human reliability assessment

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Firmino, P.R.A. ; Dept. of Production Eng., Fed. Univ. of Pernambuco, Recife ; Menezes, R.C.S. ; Droguett, E.L. ; de Lemos Duarte, D.C.

The data scarcity is one of the main problems for human reliability analyses. This theme has also emerged from the introduction of sophisticated techniques into the area, such as the formalism of Bayesian belief networks that permit the utilization of multidisciplinary sources of information. Such flexibility makes possible more accurate models which in many cases may require data accessible only qualitatively. In these cases, an alternative way is to elicit such information through protocols directed to experts. Among the methods cited in the literature, the one proposed by (G.C. Nadler et al., 2001) promotes (1) the self-knowledge of the expert about his numeric beliefs and (2) indicators that ensure mathematically the quality of both the questionnaire for elicitation and the expert opinions. However, the high number of questions may render such method inappropriate for quantifying a large number of parameters. Furthermore, the quality indicators proposed by (G.C. Nadler et al., 2001) do not guarantee reliable results when the questionnaire is reduced. Therefore, this paper proposes a quality indicator that, when combined with the known ones, allows for an adequate quantification of qualitative knowledge about human reliability problems with a reduced number of questions. It is also presented cost reduction results obtained from the application of the proposed approach in two real problems

Published in:

Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006. RAMS '06. Annual

Date of Conference:

23-26 Jan. 2006

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.