Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Validation of MODIS F/sub PAR/ products in boreal forests of Alaska

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Steinberg, D.C. ; Woods Hole Res. Center, MA ; Goetz, S.J. ; Hyer, E.J.

Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by vegetation (FPAR ) products covering the boreal forest of interior Alaska were analyzed and compared with field measurements of canopy light harvesting over a multiyear period (2001 to 2004), as well as to high-resolution F PAR maps derived from IKONOS and Landsat ETM+ imagery. The spatial variability of FPAR within the MODIS products was examined by incorporating the field measurements and aggregating the high-resolution FPAR maps to the MODIS scale. Characterization of the temporal accuracy of the MODIS FPAR products was conducted through comparisons with continuously operating canopy light interception measurements. The MODIS product tended to overestimate FPAR relative to both ground-based measurements and Landsat-derived estimates of FPAR, particularly in the more sparsely vegetated burn scars on which we focus related research, but adequately captured seasonal variability associated with vegetation phenology. A combination of canopy closure and ground cover vegetation was identified as the source of most of the discrepancies between the MODIS estimated and field measured FPAR values. Neither the field measurements nor the high resolution image FPAR maps based on the field measurements characterized the light environment of the ground cover vegetation (i.e., <10 cm height); thus, absolute validation of the MODIS products was incomplete - despite the extensive spatial and temporal characterization of FPAR dynamics in the study region. We discuss these results, explore some other possible sources for observed differences between the MODIS, field, and high-resolution FPAR maps, and consider possible ways to address these issues in future work

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:44 ,  Issue: 7 )

Date of Publication:

July 2006

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.