By Topic

A Comparison of Feature Selection Methods for the Detection of Breast Cancers in Mammograms: Adaptive Sequential Floating Search vs. Genetic Algorithm

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Sun, Y. ; Fischer Imaging Corp., Denver, CO ; Babbs, C.F. ; Delp, E.J.

This paper presents a comparison of feature selection methods for a unified detection of breast cancers in mammograms. A set of features, including curvilinear features, texture features, Gabor features, and multi-resolution features, were extracted from a region of 512times512 pixels containing normal tissue or breast cancer. Adaptive floating search and genetic algorithm were used for the feature selection, and a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used for the classification of cancer regions from normal regions. The performance is evaluated using A z the area under ROC curve. On a dataset consisting 296 normal regions and 164 cancer regions (53 masses, 56 spiculated lesions, and 55 calcifications), adaptive floating search achieved Az=0.96 with comparison to Az=0.93 of CHC genetic algorithm and Az=0.90 of simple genetic algorithm

Published in:

Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005. IEEE-EMBS 2005. 27th Annual International Conference of the

Date of Conference:

17-18 Jan. 2006